Former policy and campaign adviser to President Bush, Karl Rove, has undergone a tremendous amount of scrutiny for what many of his critics perceived to be dirty politics. That's because he's a very, very dirty practitioner of politics. As campaign guru and top political adviser, how could he not be? If you have a Presidential campaign going on, having the President advocate, or even enact, a particular policy that would help the campaign serves your self interest. Since you have most of the power in the policy realm, there's no need to get the policy people on board. Very little or no debate ensues. There's no chance for the policy people to say no. So the policy serves the campaign. This is not how it's worked in past administrations.
So, in 2002, with crucial midterm elections coming, campaign adviser Karl told policy adviser Karl to get those neocons and other hawks in the administration (who were always going to invade Iraq during the Bush presidency) to time the invasion so it would do the most political damage to the Democrats. The vote to authorize the use of force against Iraq took place on October 10 and 11, 2002, just three weeks before the midterm election. What a coincidence that geo-politics would line up with an important election that way.
Still deep in the post-9/11 haze, 29 Democrats including John Kerry, John Edwards and Hillary Clinton (
text of her floor speech here) made the terrible mistake of voting for the resolution. To the extent that that decision to vote for the resolution was based on short term political gain--the survival of the Democratic Party in the face of a highly unfavorable cycle--blame for the passage of this resolution rests with the gaming of the system done by Karl Rove and the inability of Democratic leadership, especially on the parts of Senators Kerry and Clinton, to make the case against the invasion.

Bloodthirsty salivating by Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz and Donald Rumsfeld alone would not have allowed Shock and Awe to happen without consent of Congress. If Rove had allowed the resolution to come to vote in December of 2002 or anytime thereafter, it may not have passed, and it certainly would have received far more resistance.
Five years and five months later, how did all work out for Rove?
Take a look
at his house. Not bad, eh?