Sunday, June 01, 2008

Why Would Hillary Need The Devil When She Has Terry McAuliffe And Harold Ickes?

by Hector Diego

Terry and Harold are on the same page.

What a farce! This morning I watched some campaign coverage, and heard Terry McAuliffe claim that Hillary was a stronger candidate against McCain because half of all women voted for her in the primaries--without mentioning that the other half were Obama supporters! OK, maybe it's not a 50/50 split, but you get my point. McAuliffe is as slippery as a cherub's naked ass, but there was more to come.

When McAuliffe and Stephanopolis concluded their discussion, I switched channels to hear Harold Ickes tell Tim Russert that the Clinton campaign did not feel that the people in Michigan who voted "undeclared" voted for Obama. So then who did they vote for, Hillary's Grandma? He also claimed that it was Obama's own fault that he did not put his name on the ballot in Michigan, even though he obviously did not because he thought the state would not be in play, having broken the rules and having a too early primary.

And Ickes was a party to those rules in the first place! Ickes is as slippery as greased lightning. At least a snake is dry. I found him to be rather icky.

These guys are lying through their teeth, and it is so obvious you wonder how they can look at themselves in the mirror.

1 comment:

Subhadra said...

They can't look themselves in the mirror, or anyone else in the eye...did you notice Harold "save a sinking ship" Icke's body language?
His eyes were closed for at least 80% of the discussion.

Archive

Antique walrus print courtesy of FineRarePrints.Com