
Dr. Richard Dawkins
Oxford University
I must respectfully but sincerely disagree with my good friend the Station Agent about Dr. Dawkins, the atheist of the hour.
Dawkins feels that science should take a page from religion, and fight religion as religion has fought science. First of all, I believe it is stupid for religion to fight science, since it uses it all the time. Yet I feel that it is equally stupid for science to fight religion because the business of science is to discover and produce, not philosophize.
Let religion and science mind their own business.
Dawkins has a right to attack religion, as far as civil rights go. But his advocated program of systematically attacking religion in schools
vis a vis science curriculum denies the civil rights of religion, which then has no means to defend itself. Dawkins is saying that only science--or rather, scientism--has civil rights. What's more, religious people would be paying for the attack on religion through taxes.
Why am I talking about social institutions, intellectual positions, etc, as having civil rights? The reason is that all of this stuff boils down to people. Dawkins is calling on his colleagues to endorse Dawkins and those who agree with him, as dictators.
If this ever happened, it could bring no good to science, for the backlash would be horrendous. Let science and religion go their separate ways, and when they should chance to meet, nod to each other like civilized people should, and leave it at that.
Dawkins is a living example that
scientism can be as oppressive as any religious Inquisition, for if you don't agree with him that all things knowable are knowable by science alone, you are a fool according to Dawkins.
I know too many very intelligent people who would disagree with Dr. Dawkins, to go for his proposal. Some of my most revered professors come to mind here, and I know that these people are not the fools Dawkins would have me take them for. I respect his knowledge, and even his conviction, but his rhetoric and plan for scientistic--not scientific--education prove that
it is he who is the fool...and a pompous, dictatorial one at that.
So the religious have trampled on science in the past. Do two wrongs make a right?
Just for a lark, here's Thomas Dolby's
She Blinded Me With Science.
Tags: Dawkins, scientism